• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

Cain’s Campaign Suffers, But Not Because of TARP, Endorsement of Romney, Cluelessness on Economy, No Specific Budget Cuts, Etc.

So Herman Cain’s poll numbers are down, thanks to accusations of marital infidelity — in other words, the same kind of things that the very same voters are prepared to overlook in Newt Gingrich, whose numbers are rising.

What did not manage to bring Cain’s poll numbers down, oddly enough, was his actual record on issues his supporters pretended to care about. They don’t like TARP. He did. (And please, his excuse makes no sense.) They don’t like Romney. Cain endorsed Romney in ’08. They want to cut spending. Cain has given no specific spending cuts, and actually criticized Ron Paul for wanting to cut too much (as if that were possible).

And on the eve of the financial crisis, Cain was still saying the economy was in terrific shape. In the very month of the collapse!

That’s the guy you want running the show during a world-historic meltdown?

The guy should have been brought down months ago by his stated views — and would have been, if people cared more about principles and less about whether a guy stands up straight, gives a good speech, or ran a business.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    Peace and Trade.  That’s what you are afraid of, peace and trade.

    It’s time to face the fact that countries that trade with each other don’t attack each other.  They don’t have to like one another, or agree on religion, or even speak the same language; trade facilitates peace.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    I totally agree.  Compare homeschooled kids to publik school kids… this becomes glaringly evident.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    In your honest opinion, if Ron wins Iowa, do you think he’ll get the “surge” coverage from the media?  Or will he, and Iowa, be downplayed by the media?

    I’m betting the conservative-right media (Rush/Glenn/Levin; O’Reilly/Hannity/Krauthammer) will downplay the win, claim vote tampering, or discount the “conservative-ness” of Iowans, while the progressive-left will cover it in the hopes that Obama can beat Paul in the General.

    We can only hope…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    Campaign donations are voluntary, as well.

    Newt’s payments from GSEs were tax-funded.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    If Schiff had won the senate seat in Connecticut then he’s be poinsed to run in 2016.

    Rand pulled it off and is in that position.

  • Liljack

    I think all this “growing conservative movement” wants is to preserve the status quo.  As long as they have their jobs, can feed their families and live off their credit cards and the equity in their homes is all that matters. They don’t want someone like Ron Paul rocking the boat.