• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

Fastest Postal Worker Reprimanded for Not Following Rules

At first, I thought this would be the most interesting line in the article: “A dedicated German postman who figured out the quickest routes between postal depots to speed up his work has escaped criminal charges and managed to keep his job with just a reprimand for not working to rule.”

Then I read on.

The 53-year-old postie from Rosenheim near Munich came under suspicion when colleagues realized he was faster at the job than they were – and one of them reported him, assuming he was throwing away the mail instead of delivering it….

The case ended up at the administrative court in Aibling and…the court heard he had ignored post office rules to make his working day more efficient.

He told the court how he had been saving time after working out quicker routes between the postal depots — where mail is held for postmen and women to pick up and then deliver.

His immediate boss admitted knowing at least in part about the man’s time-saving methods, and said she had informally tolerated them.

“I admit that some of them are possibly logical,” she said — but said they could not be officially accepted as they did not fit the rules.

The court case against him was dismissed, but it was not recorded whether he would have to return to a less efficient way of working.

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Christopher-Bell/1063326951 Christopher Bell

    OBEY.

  • Anonymous

    The first thing I thought of when I read this was Mises’s ‘Bureaucracy’.

  • Anonymous

    Now now, gentlemen, I’m sure we’ve all had women reprimand us for being too fast…

  • Michael Dean Lewis

    Sounds like the one who reported him would make a good Nazi.

  • Scott Lazarowitz

    “Sounds like the one who reported him would make a good Nazi.”

    Nazis and bureaucrats (sorry for the redundancy) seem to need people to follow arbitrary rules and procedures, regardless of their efficiency. That’s just the nature of the government monopolist.

    For some reason, I am reminded of the episode of Fawlty Towers in which Basil has German guests at his hotel, and he makes fun of them.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7xnNhzgcWTk

  • Michael Mills

    Actually a Good Communist, reporting your neighbors was a communist’s greatest duty… How do I know? I’ve seen it first hand.

  • chris

    fortunately for Germany, the state post office is due to be privatized in the next couple of years. His skills are going to be quite handy in a private company: which is obviously quite the opposite of the case today.

  • Anonymous

    Interesting.

    But is it actual privatization or is it fake privatization?

    Actual Privatization: the government simply leaves the market and anybody who wants to can compete

    Fake Privatization: the government appoints companies to run an industry and gives them tons of subsidies and monopoly privileges.

    My guess is the latter, but I’ll be pleasantly surprised if Lysander Spooner’s legacy can live on somewhere.

  • chris

    there is also the 3rd option in which they make the rules so bad that even though they have a virtual monopoly, they fail. This way the gov. can come back and say: ‘you see, privatization doesn’t work !’
    I agree it’s probably going to be the worst combination of all.