This is interesting to me because if I find some words hardly used to describe something makes me what? This is like a theoretical exercises. Theoretical do not mean results they mean ideas. I have found in all cases of economic theory and emphasis to show I am smart versus the expertise to show results.

A positive effect is simply, it supports me and those like me, a negative effect shows no support what so ever and is make believe.

Good ideas are not the ones you spread but rather the ones you can show perform well in support of you and those like you. I would love to have this guy in the same rooms, his theories and my examples. Not sure he would fare that well because it is not as complicated as the picture he paints at all. Becoming an expert is the use of some idea, not the writing of the ideas. Symbolism and Scholars of these symbols has become the emphasis and not the activities themselves.

Not to say Phillip is not intelligent, he is, he actually lacks experiences. To master a poor idea for old old history is not experienced, it is scholarly.

I’ve read ‘The Tragedy Of the Euro’ and it’s a great book. Although it’s quite short (130 pages) there’s is lots of good information. However Bagus should have written more about the different crises of the PIIGS states. Instead he focuses primarily on Greece. This is sad because it’s not that easy to get the austrian perspective on the european financial crises!

I totally expect this response Mr. Woods, no disrespect sir but priding yourself on what you call intellect is a very high objective in this country. It is not what I can show, it becomes how many big words I can put together.

The truth is these concept if drilled down came from the Rule idea, they are all bogus by result. Show me any society that is prospering out the roof by what he is saying. When I say out the roof, I mean where all communities are able to sustain with ease where it is being used.

I can show unquestionably where it originated, how it is consistently across the board failed over and over all over the world. Economics comes from this idea of wealth and property and not from creations and achievements which WE all do. Sustainment COMES from delivering ideas people need and want to grow out lives.

But see you will never listen to me, or even look because I don’t run around attempting to impress everyone with pretty little words. And for the record I really like your work on Nullification. But not because of the pretty words but because it is true and workable.

I know things because I test things not because I memorize symbols like most intellects. My apologies if that is too bold for you, just stating much of what I see in my world and not what I THINK it is.

It’s spooky. Like, plausible Turing contender spooky.

If you get past all the abysmal grammar, absent punctuation, and garbled language – quite a feat, by the way – I believe the point of the poster is that unless they can provide concrete, real-world proof that something is successful, no one should theorize about anything, particularly in writing.  Further, only “experience” begets knowledge; everything else is just intellectual, eliteist frippery.

Its William,

Maybe these english words were to tough for you to understand if it was off topic. Then you attempt to write in typical greek because why have understanding when you can be intellectual and pound your chest on a stage. I laugh at all who put me down to make you feel good about you. I get you have all worked hard to think you understand this ridiculous language with its own set of baggage. But you can pretend I did not read history on language if you wish, and I bet you have mastered at least 3 unabridged dictionaries also correct?

You can also act like you are more capable than I but you cannot prove it. I am ok with what I do, and some like my writing and (mostly intellects) hate it. And when I speak to the intellectuals in conversations they cannot even tell. That is the tests I have done and I am laughing at the nonsense. No, I did not memorize words, I have attempted 1000s of times to master it and finally after looking at how it got this way I had to ask myself what is so important? The ability to communicate and bring into being understanding or to be some professor of terms without experience? 

But I get you love looking at everyone else and correcting them, I wonder how perfect YOU are, I am betting you suck at several things but I don”t need to be pointing them out to you do I? If these words are too easy for you I totally understand, really, it must be tough being up in the clouds thinking you are all that while the rest of us get things done all around you. And for the record you know what mutual respect means don’t you, you get what you give.

Nobody owes you proof man.  We’re fighting against a system that prevents us from “proving” these kind of ideas work.  That’s why we support this theorising – we want to prove it works.

No one does and I am fighting that very system, but so many will not look at its root. You just keep thinking you are  worthy of theories and that is all you will be. Rise above the bull being spread. Ideas are like dust particles in the wind, there are literally billions of them, but the only ones that can be viewed are the ones achieved and that comes from testing theories not spreading them around without the testing part. Thats why we are here because of assumptions. Proof is what I do and not what someone does for me, yet if I bring an argument to the able its because I have located the truth and have something to show and challenging each other is honesty. Its impossible to fight without the knowledge of how to. But if you are only interested in theories instead of application then by all means try to make me look bad so what, you can look good? I have gone far past theories in my life, have you?