• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

Here Is Your Choice, Citizen

Kevin Gutzman writes:

In the race to replace U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman, we have:

On one hand, Rep. Chris Murphy: voted for TARP, Stimulus, and Obamacare, then ran for reelection as a “fiscal conservative.”

On the other hand, wrestling executive Linda McMahon, whose campaign to this point has focused on Murphy’s congressional attendance record and now is running TV ads saying that defense spending mustn’t be cut because we need more submarines built in Connecticut. You know: submarines to fight the Taliban.

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • LibertyLover

    It’s a terrible decision to have to make. Perhaps the Connecticut citizens should remove their consent.

  • Steve H.

    The political system is hopelessly broken. Let’s wait until the inevitable collapse comes, then pick up the pieces.

  • Anonymous

    I had the painful disappointment of seeing a libertarian friend (a college pal of Justin Raimondo, no less!!), inform me that she wasn’t going to vote for Schiff in the primary, but for the wrestling gal.
    The usual crap about “electability” plus she was a WOMAN.
    Chick thing, I guess. Overrules logic.
    lesser = still evil.

  • Peter

    If it wasn’t for McMahon, Peter Schiff would have been running

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXUI2U5IPS7IABBMSM4I27BYDA chris

    They could have had Schiff. WE could ahve had Ron Paul.
    I honestly believe the natin will look back at this time with regret.

Find me on Google