• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

How to Improve the Economy? Why, Impose a 54.5 MPG Auto Mandate!

This plan, says a booster, will “create jobs,” save Americans money, improve the auto industry, etc. Kind of makes you wonder why automakers wouldn’t just go ahead and do it, if it’s so good for them, but you are not supposed to ask that question.

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • Anonymous

    Devil’s advocate: It would be just like the evil bastards to LOBBY for such a standard to form another Govt. mandated mini-monopoly.

  • will_89

    It could mean more oil for the military-industrial complex to use.

  • Anonymous

    I swear, a three year old could poke holes through most of the big ideas that are proposed these days.

  • BD

    Mind-numbingly stupid. The first two sentences set up the entire mentality of this economically ignorant statist. Awful! Just awful!

  • timbercruiser

    OH, the author is with the natrual resources defense council. That explains everything.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Grim/26519204 Steven Grim

    This is why I get a little bit angry every time I open the hood of my car to check the oil. I stand there pondering what would be in my engine compartment if engineers weren’t reinventing the wheel every 5-10 years to comply with federal fuel efficiency and emissions standards. Probably a more reliable and less expensive engine.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Mitrosky/717647120 Michael Mitrosky

    Somebody should tell the author of the 54.5mpg article that ford already makes vehicles that get over 70mpg – in Europe.

    Govt regulations in America prohibit those 70+mpg cars from being sold in the USA.

  • eric j

    I’ll add to the mix by encouraging people to do a little research on the John Pogue Carburetor from the 1930′s and Tom Ogle’s similar invention in the 1970′s. These little gems were getting over 100 mpg. Strange you say!? A client of mine who is a ‘motorhead’ shared the experience of one of his relatives who had purchased an American vehicle, which shall remain presently nameless, back in the 1980′s and, by mistake, the mfr. had put on on this particular truck an experimental carburetor that was consistently getting 45 mpg. Not to shabby for a truck in the 1980′s. Needless to say, after checking and doublechecking and then relaying this to the mfr., they wanted him to bring in the truck to “fix” it. “NFW!!” was his response to them…and rightfully so.
    When enough people realize that the US Gvt and it’s bedfellows in the auto & oil industries are there to dutifully “stick it” to the American people then we’ll start to see some real change. For now, the MPG requirements will inch up in proportion to the long term expected price of gasoline…..so you’ll ALWAYS be spending the same percentage of your household income on fuel. Funny how that works.

  • Frank M

    Eric, I will look up Pogue and Ogle. Sounds interesting. Thanks. But I feel compelled to tell you that when I was a little kid, I heard the same story about the “experimental” high mileage carburetor that was “installed by mistake.” That was during the Nixon Administration. That doesn’t mean your client or his relative wasn’t telling the truth. I suppose these top secret carburetors could’ve been installed by mistake every 10 years or so. But you know, since carburetors went the wayside around 1990, I have to wonder how many miles they got out of secret fuel injected vehicles?

  • http://twitter.com/thinkliberdy Dave B

    Side note:

    Your book, Politically Incorrect Guide to American History, made the Amazon top 100 “Red” books. http://www.amazon.com/gp/election-heatmap#4

  • Anonymous

    How many people will this kill, as cars get lighter – to improve fuel efficiency – they become more dangerous.

  • Pastor Ko-Rect

    Another good mandate would be to require that all physical transportation is eliminated by 2014 and is replaced by molecular transformation. We could save $trillions and have more money to bailout gamblers and bomb friends.

  • http://twitter.com/bmac6446 Bobby McKeown

    As with all things economic, there are trade offs. We could easily achieve that standard but at what trade off? Having been a truck driver in Germany for over 7 years I witnessed the trade off of light weight cars and high speeds. Pretty gruesome.