• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

Is YouTube Planning to Charge for Some Channels?

YouTube has reportedly invited roughly 25 producers to submit applications for channels whose content users would have to pay to view. The revenue would be split 55-45 in favor of the user.

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • Joel Poindexter

    Good. Maybe this will discredit — to some extent at least — the Luddites who are afraid of the digital and its impact on entertainment media.

  • Evgeny

    Why just channels … and just 25 producers? Pay for content if author said it isn’t created for free.

  • Jerry

    I would say “Hey Youtube, you provide hosting, I do everything else. 80-20 is the best you’re gonna get, or I’m off to Vimeo”.

  • Jim

    This is a fantastic development. People have long wanted a-la-carte television, but can’t have it thanks to local, state and federal monopolies. A bunch of companies (Netflix, Amazon, Google/YouTube, Vimeo, etc) are about to finally bust this nonsense and actually give people what they want. Great news for consumers! Lets hope they can keep the ISPs from throttling user bandwidth.

  • Jeremy

    Guess I won’t be viewing any of the content of the 25 producers they’re talking about.

  • Anonymous

    Huh, a pay wall. Worked for the Times, eh?

  • http://twitter.com/HeatForce Jay Brown

    Well on the PSN there’s also Hulu Plus and Amazon video and for anime fans crunchy roll & neon alley.