• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

The Lying New York Times

Writes economist George Reisman:

The November 30, 2012 National (print) Edition of The New York Times’ main front page story is titled “Complaints Aside, Most Face Lower Tax Burden Than in the Reagan ’80s.”

The story takes up a sixth of the first page and spans an additional full two and a third pages inside the paper. It is clearly meant to convey something major and that at the same time happens to provide support for the Obama Administration’s current efforts to raise taxes. Namely, the proposition that accepting Obama’s tax increases will still leave most people with lower taxes than they paid under Reagan.

Unfortunately, for The Times and its prodigious propaganda effort, throughout the article “the Reagan ’80s” turn out to mean just the year 1980, which was not at all part of the Reagan ’80s, but was the last year of the Carter Administration….

Interestingly, the Times may have already been told that its headline was blatantly dishonest. Its online version of the same article carries the title “Tax Burden Is Lower for Most Americans Than in the 1980s.” The Times apparently thinks that it can get away with its dishonesty simply by removing the reference to Reagan.

Read Reisman’s blog post “Dishonesty on Front Page of New York Times.”

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • vox

    Although I thrive on as much accurate historical information as possible; who cares whether taxes were lower or higher in the past? Taxation and public spending is clearly immoral, and it should be beaten back as far as possible. One thing is for sure: the government is going to default indirectly or directly. We’re broke. All public spending is arbitrary and unaccountable and its merits are dubious at best. I’d argue they’re downright harmful to the well-being of humanity.
    Americans love divorce (under heavy influence by the state). Let’s take that concept and apply it to discussions of nullification and secession. If and when states leave the union, let them go. You can still be friends and trade with them. It can be a much more amicable separation than husband and wife.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, I just appreciate the reminder that there is a George Reisman blog!!!
    I’m gonna hang out there a while and look at the archives.
    Thanks, Tom. And thanks to the missus for the great turkey technique.

  • fr33mannh

    Its so important to have eyes/ears of truth and to share the same! We no longer have a credible MSM press corps. If not for the alternative press, we would be forever lost in the lies/deceit!