• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

The Pressure Builds on Krugman

I uploaded this image to my Facebook page yesterday.

PaulKrugman

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • Mike

    LOL. Go get’em Tom :)

  • Anonymous

    We ALREADY know Krugman is a flack for the establishment, don’t we?–that’s why he’s so often featured on the news-shows w. all the friendly talking-heads; why he got the Nobel prize, etc.–he makes socialists and statists (who are decided minority) feel soooo good, evidently. EVERYONE else (most folks) sees what a shifty weasel he really is.

    So all anyone needs to know is Krugman is for COUNTERFEITING, which is what the present Fed system really is, just legalized. Even children understand what countefeiting is.

    I read Murphy’s book, the “Politically Incorrect Guide to Great Dep. and FDR,” and it was genuinely good book, BUT there’s something u need to face-up to which is Murphy IS NOT a good speaker–no where near as slick as Tom Woods or forthright (in style, I mean) as Ron Paul who did so well and effectively against Krugman a few months ago.

    For Murphy, bless his Austrian heart, is far tooooooooooooo given to stuttering about, and hedging his statements w. prefatory-type phrases, unlike other capable and knowledgeable speakers, as afore-mentioned.

    So, if u want to just see Krugman made to look poorly, u already got the Ron Paul vid; otherwise, Krugman’s handlers already know he’s only good for shallow impressions and propaganda–that’s why they might well venture a go w. Murphy as Murphy will stutter and stammer, as usual, not looking so good even if he nails Krugman w. some (or many) facts and logic–which will impress only a few spectators, the rest more susceptive of style and glib smoothery.

  • the ‘liberal rater’

    Krugman reminds me of the bearded lady at the circus.

  • samgrace

    I disagree, I think Murphy is a great speaker. I don’t know of another libertarian who knows so much and has a great sense of humor like Murphy.

  • Roger Stigliano

    I don’t understand the need for a debate. The essence of a correct scientific theory is that it allows accurate predictions to be made. If Murphy’s theories are correct, they will predict the future performance of the US economy. So it should not be more than two or three years before everyone is an Austrian.

  • Bernardo

    Come on, Krugman. It’s 100,000 bucks of savings that will go SPENDING. Imagine that multiplier, man! Aren’t you a keynesian, after all?

Find me on Google