• "Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that should invite further study."
    -Journal of American History

  • "During these times that challenge our freedoms there is no one more qualified to make U.S. history relevant to the fight against big government than Thomas Woods."
    -Barry Goldwater Jr.
    Former Member of Congress

  • "I strongly recommend Woods's work."
    -The Honorable Ron Paul,
    U.S. House of Representatives

  • "Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
    -Journal of American Studies

  • "A must-read."
    -Barron's

  • "An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
    -Asia Times

  • "Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
    -Catholic Historical Review

  • "An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
    -Journal of the Historical Society

  • "Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
    -Publishers Weekly

  • "A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
    -Tom Bethell, senior editor,
    The American Spectator

  • "The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
    -Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
    FOX News Channel

  • "Should be required reading."
    -Economic Affairs (London)

  • "Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
    -David Gordon, The Mises Review

  • "Tom Woods is one of my dearest allies in the struggle against wrong-headed and dangerous economic policy."
    -Peter Schiff

Who Benefits from Labor Unions?

Gary North connected some dots for me the other day.

Who benefits from labor unions? Naturally, union members themselves. They forcibly keep out of an industry or a firm some group of workers who are qualified and willing to work at the wage offered. I go into the legal details in 33 Questions About American History You’re Not Supposed to Ask.

Unions, therefore, are not in the business of benefiting “the workers.” They benefit some workers at the expense of others. Those others, to the extent they are acknowledged at all, are dismissed with dehumanizing epithets.

Those others now have to compete in an artificially enlarged pool for other jobs, which means lower wages. These other jobs, moreover, do not match the skills these workers acquired, since the unions have shut them out of jobs where they could use those skills. The effect is the same as if they had never acquired those skills in the first place. So society is impoverished out of proportion to the gains earned by the union workers.

(I am leaving out the countless ways in which unions undermine productivity and thus wages for everyone, including themselves. There’s a pretty good discussion of all this in the labor chapter of The Church and the Market, the introduction to Austrian economics I wrote with an eye to, but not exclusively for, a Catholic audience.)

But the other group that benefits, and this is what escaped me, are of course the nonunionized firms and industries that can now choose from an artificially increased labor pool and can offer correspondingly lower wages. With workers prevented from working where they fit best within the division of labor, they have to seek employment elsewhere.

So there is an unspoken alliance between labor unions and nonunionized firms and industries. Both parties favor the same policies. Labor unions can’t say this, of course, because that would blow their cover and reveal that they are not, after all, the friends of labor per se. They are friends of politically privileged labor. The rest of the working population can eat cake.

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • Luke Sunderland

    I agree with everything you say. However, even this doesn’t go far enough. It’s not true that unions benefit only politically privileged labor, they only benefit the politically privileged among that politically privileged group (the union leaders themselves).
    Speaking from personal experience – I used to belong to a union (and a public sector union at that) and they never did anything for me aside from take union dues out of my paycheck against my will and browbeat me into standing on picket lines.

  • timbercruiser

    I am reminded of the scene in “Armed and Dangerous” (John Candy) where John asks why the union takes so much money, and the union thug says, “shut up and sign the %$* paper”