<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Nullification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomwoods.com</link>
	<description>Tom Woods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-19810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasewoods.com/?page_id=615#comment-19810</guid>
		<description>If we are the sovereigns, the we should be able to declare nullification on an individual basis of the government&#039;s unauthorized restricting and suspension of our inalienable rights. How would we? &amp; Who would back us up or enforce our Right to nullify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are the sovereigns, the we should be able to declare nullification on an individual basis of the government&#8217;s unauthorized restricting and suspension of our inalienable rights. How would we? &amp; Who would back us up or enforce our Right to nullify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-18007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasewoods.com/?page_id=615#comment-18007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Southerner living up north. I will back up Joshua and say that they are fond of government here. No doubt about it. On the issue of nullification, it is part of the checks and balances that should rightfully exist in a Republican form of government. Without States rights there is simply The State. Without States rights then the States are really just colonies and the people just serfs. I will take it one step further and suggest  secession which should not be used for light and transient causes, preserves states rights as well. Remember that the New England threatened secession before the south did. When two people get married, they take a vow to stay together &quot;till death do us part.&quot; I&#039;ve never read of any state taking such a vow to D.C. If only we took marriage vows as seriously as the notion of a perpetual political union how much better shape our country would be in. However, I still believe in America as a whole. Vote Ron Paul and restore INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY!!!!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Southerner living up north. I will back up Joshua and say that they are fond of government here. No doubt about it. On the issue of nullification, it is part of the checks and balances that should rightfully exist in a Republican form of government. Without States rights there is simply The State. Without States rights then the States are really just colonies and the people just serfs. I will take it one step further and suggest  secession which should not be used for light and transient causes, preserves states rights as well. Remember that the New England threatened secession before the south did. When two people get married, they take a vow to stay together &#8220;till death do us part.&#8221; I&#8217;ve never read of any state taking such a vow to D.C. If only we took marriage vows as seriously as the notion of a perpetual political union how much better shape our country would be in. However, I still believe in America as a whole. Vote Ron Paul and restore INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Figmentofmyownimagination</title>
		<link>http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-16145</link>
		<dc:creator>Figmentofmyownimagination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasewoods.com/?page_id=615#comment-16145</guid>
		<description>this sounds like disinformation of the highest degree. lmao. everything ive heard from Tom&#039;s own mouth goes against his assertions!  Load up Jefferey Lord&#039;s inbox with boos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this sounds like disinformation of the highest degree. lmao. everything ive heard from Tom&#8217;s own mouth goes against his assertions!  Load up Jefferey Lord&#8217;s inbox with boos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Figmentofmyownimagiantion</title>
		<link>http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-16144</link>
		<dc:creator>Figmentofmyownimagiantion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasewoods.com/?page_id=615#comment-16144</guid>
		<description>jefferey lord from the american spectator calls Tom a Neo-Con Historian? how can he say that?
Jeffrey Lord on 12.12.11 @ 4:59PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jefferey lord from the american spectator calls Tom a Neo-Con Historian? how can he say that?<br />
Jeffrey Lord on 12.12.11 @ 4:59PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Kagan Must Recuse Herself from ObamaCare Case &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.tomwoods.com/learn-about-state-nullification/comment-page-1/#comment-14848</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Kagan Must Recuse Herself from ObamaCare Case &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasewoods.com/?page_id=615#comment-14848</guid>
		<description>[...] these powers would continue to grow regardless of separation of powers. This is why James Madison declared that states were “duty bound to resist” any federal law that violated the Constitution. A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these powers would continue to grow regardless of separation of powers. This is why James Madison declared that states were “duty bound to resist” any federal law that violated the Constitution. A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

